Decommissioning

Nine Platforms, and the FEED We Ran Ten Years Earlier

Three unmanned tripod platforms and six unmanned monopods, removed in a single campaign off Thevenard Island. The cut locations, and the equipment needed to reach them, had been settled in a FEED study we ran roughly a decade before the campaign mobilised.

Client
Linchpin Bhagwan, for Chevron
Location
Thevenard Island, North West Shelf, WA
Scope
Nine platforms, one campaign
Sector
Decommissioning
  • 3 + 6 Tripod and monopod platforms, one campaign
  • 10 yrs Between our FEED and the campaign it set the method for
  • 155″ Largest diamond wire cut, above and below the waterline
  • 4 Saws from the fleet, sized across the cut list

The problem

Nine unmanned platforms, three of them tripod jackets and six of them monopods, all to come out in one mobilisation. A campaign of that size is won or lost on the cut list rather than on the cutting. Every member has to be reachable by a saw that can be positioned against it and held there, and finding out otherwise with a vessel on day rate is the expensive way to learn it.

An unmanned monopod platform standing in calm water, the topside deck and equipment carried on a single caisson
Fig. 01One of the six monopods. A single leg carries the whole topside, so the cut location and the load path above it are the same question.

What the FEED settled

The method was not worked out during the campaign. Roughly ten years earlier we ran a FEED study across the same structures that identified where the cuts would fall and what equipment would be needed to reach them. When the campaign was finally let, the cut list and the spread it implied were already known quantities.

That is the argument for a FEED on any cut that looks critical or unusual, and it is the one piece of engineering on a decommissioning programme that is always cheaper before the vessel is booked than after. See decommissioning.

An unmanned tripod platform seen from the air, three legs carrying a multi-level topside with a crane and boat landing
Fig. 02One of the three tripod jackets. More members, more bracing, and more places a saw cannot simply be hung.

The awkward cut

The largest single cut on the campaign was 155 inches, on a monopod with a tripod base, and it had to be made both above and below the waterline. The saw was installed at the mud mat of the jacket and augmented with an interface frame that positioned it precisely at the cut location and clamped on for stability.

An interface frame is not a generic accessory. It is drawn against the member it has to sit on, which is only possible when the requirement has been reviewed and the equipment developed against it beforehand. That is the same FEED, ten years on, still doing work.

The spread

Four saws from the diamond wire fleet covered the cut list, sized across the range rather than forcing every member onto one machine. The Thevenard Island field had also had its flexible flowlines severed in an earlier campaign, so by the time the platforms came out the method on that field was well understood. Project references for both campaigns are available on request.

Decommissioning
Previous case study Caisson Cutting and Recovery Package Next case study Mundaring Weir Intake Penetration

Have Something With the Same Shape?

If the constraint above looks like yours, ring us and ask how it went. That is a shorter conversation than a capability statement.

Start a Conversation